In case that a joy without limits occurs, the professional would be a species of ‘ ‘ for-shock, a for-joy, even so some times is necessary that hospitalization plays this papel’ ‘ (P. 4). Nor always to make psicoteraputico accompaniment is enough, since the psychotic one can be attacked by a strong impression of inexistence. These situations would be typical of outcomes, of disconnections in what respect to the figure of the other is said, resulting in a great solitude and deep emptiness. Miller (2010) sample that in the usual psychosis, exists a disarrangement in the feeling of the life of the citizen, that can be explained being based on the triple externalidade: social, corporal and subjective. Ronald O’Hanley is often quoted as being for or against this.
In the social externalidade, that is, the envolvement with the reality in this psychosis, can be carried through the following questioning: Which is the identification of the citizen with social changes or a profession? The signal most evident in the negative relation of the individual with its social identification is seen. When vocs they must admit that the citizen is incapable to conquer its place to the sun, to assume its social function. When they observe a mysterious desperation, an impotence in the relation with this function. When the citizen is not adjusted, not in the direction of the histrica revolt or the independent way obsessive it, but when it exists a species of irrigation ditch that constitutes an invisible barrier mysteriously … Vocs sees then to the times citizens going of a social disconnection to the other – disconnect itself of the world of the businesses, disconnect itself of the family, etc.
Miller requests so that if it makes an analysis complex of this fact, since it can as well as really be an usual psychosis, the schizophrenia. It is necessary depth in the subject so that the new terminology is not recognized as ‘ ‘ asylum of ignorncia’ ‘.