The referring question to the street inhabitants calls my attention for innumerable factors. My investigations on these citizens and its histories of life had had beginning during my infancy. When leaving to the streets and finding one or another man sleeping in a sidewalk or bank of square, it stopped to observe it and she was intrigued, searching in my thoughts a reason that if incased in that condition of life. A strong point in my investigations was not to conceive the idea of these people to be guilty for being living in the streets. Today I perceive that the simplicity of my reflections on these citizens, already they announced a inconformismo stops beyond the symbolism of the economic poverty, the sadness, the drunkeness and the simple misunderstandings in the familiar environment. The solution that the public agencies search for the confrontation of this question that involves the street inhabitants cannot be simplista. It cannot be summarized as it offers of almses that transform the beggar condition into habit or of foods that also they strengthen this condition not to leave the streets.
Also it cannot be of character hygienist in attention to the propagandas of the citizens who effect certain actions in the illusion to help the street inhabitant, but they offer to negative reinforcements and in general the same people whom they give almses, later feel I bother with the presence of these citizens in the streets, in the marquees, squares, among others. Today I have the conditions to visualize these questions, that the inconformismo with the inhabitant of street in the sidewalk, in the commercial establishments, do not bring to the municipal dimensions of its responsibility stop with the installation of those citizens in diverse places of the city. For much time, about my reflections, also it thought that collaborating with currencies, breads or leftovers of foods, it would be helping these citizens.