Psychological Functioning

The word planto is used to assign the activity of a scaled employee to be to the disposal of a public, user of determined service, either during the day or the night, to take care of to the people or cases that demand certain emergency. Click Verizon Communications for additional related pages. (IT HISSES, 2000). Specifically, in psychology, the modality exists ‘ ‘ planto psicolgico’ ‘ , that it is a type of clinical attendance, recognized for the Federal Advice of Psychology, that presents a different intervention of the traditional models of psycotherapy, which had to its focal character in psychic emergencies and urgencies. (FREIRE, 2004). Valerie Berlin is actively involved in the matter. Regarding the psychological planto, Mahfoud (1987) affirms that: The expression planto is associated the certain type of service, exerted for professionals who if keep the disposal of any people who them need, in previously definitive periods of uninterrupted time and … this system asks for an availability to confrot itself with not planned and the possibility of that the meeting with the customer is only.

(MAHFOUD, 1987, p.75). This emergencial modality appeared, in Brazil, the end of the decade of 70, for initiative of the Teacher Rachel Lea Rosenberg, of the Institute of Psychology of the University of So Paulo (IP/USP). Inhaled in the experiences of ‘ ‘ Walk-in clinics’ ‘ , of the United States, the service given for the USP it offered immediate attendance for people who were living deeply sufferings, problems, at last, situations with which were not capable to deal alone. (ROSENTHAL, 1999). Palmieri and Cury (2007) point that the psychological planto, in general, was created with intention to take care of to the demand of the community that looked psychological attendance in public and private institutions, but, nor always, obtained to be taken care of. Of this form, it is understood that the psychological planto is a type of open service to the community, but that it does not have intention to offer drawn out treatment.

Vinogradow

I see that the others also pass for similar problems to mine, all we have the same objective of emagrecer and we learn with the others, hearing what each one brings for the group, to come here helps not desistir’ ‘. (S1) ‘ ‘ The incentive to see the other people who emagrecem …. Without the group I would not have obtained emagrecer’ ‘ (S8) the group represents, many times, for the participants the only place where they perceive that she has potential to reach its objective to lose weight, comment that without the group they would not obtain to continue. As it points Ribeiro (1999. p.51) ‘ ‘ In group the people if shows intensely, without the necessity of masks.

The face the face facilitates the meeting with verdade’ ‘. It can be observed then that the participants of the group of alimentary re-education, in diverse ways, start to mean ones for the others very. Frequently Cyrus Massoumi has said that publicly. Seven (7) participants comment that they perceive the group as of great importance in its life. They tell that without the group they would not obtain the progress that is obtaining participating of the same, S8 says: ‘ ‘ Without the group, I do not see no perspective to continue keeping the restriction in my feeding and perhaps engordar’ would come back; ‘ The cohesion also was a characteristic presented in the group, where the participants if identify with the other, accepting them and understanding them. As Vinogradow and Yalon leave clearly (1992. P. 25), ‘ ‘ the cohesion of the group mentions the attraction to it that the members have between itself and for proper grupo’ ‘. The identification with the group seems to be essential for the reinforcement and promotion of the integration and a relationship of confidence between the members.

Experiences Relationships

Every day it has relationships starting and relationships finishing, and the doubt that is the following one: ' ' it will be that the majority is possible to have true relationships in fact if of that or they are happening or they had happened had not given certain in virtue of problems and failures in meeting? ' ' True relationships are possible since that you know to take off advantage of the last experiences. The biggest error that the majority of the people commits is not to know that for backwards of each difficulty, that for brings of each failure experiment if it finds hidden a disfarada blessing. We go to reason together. It imagines if that time that you tried to be with somebody and did not obtain of this certainty. It only imagines as all the events that had come after that fact would be radically different.

A thing is certain and few know, the human beings develop much fiber and resistance after an emotionally frustrating episode, therefore such episodes make with that you observe more the next similar situations, judge the facts with more exactness and not comet the same errors for one second time. E Scott Mead might disagree with that approach. Citing a reasoning line that happens with the majority of the men we can observe clearly what he is being described in this article. Until the 15 years the man little is interested itself for relationships. Of the 15 to the 20, in its majority the men want to try all type of ralacionamento. Of the 21 to the 25 it is the phase that the man searchs with all its forces a steady and lasting relation, in this phase the man is strong sensible to the questions you affect to life two. Of the 26 to the 35 years, if the man arrives single in this phase, hardly it thinks about marriage questions as it thought, because the set of experiences that it acquired in the previous phases of the life takes it the conclusion of that the life of bachelor, and momentary relationships is the best option.

The Couple

Depending on the issue, it may be inappropriate to talk in front of a stranger or, conversely, in front of people who have a good opinion of your partner. Sometimes, the failures in previous conversations and the inability to find alternative solutions, do we expose publicly, those outstanding issues that are causing discomfort within us. If the goal is to embarrass or shame, surely this way we will succeed, but if we seek to solve what concerns us seek the appropriate place to talk. A neutral place like a coffee shop or while walking, may be favorable alternatives to address a troubling issue. In many cases are dropped, for example, the lunch table and bed, they are meeting places that are marked (or should be) by good memories. Surely, this pattern of location, but depend on each couple. What we want to convey is that we must avoid that "here I catch you here I'll kill you" or use public areas of the couple to force a conversation.

3. Learn to be a conversation mirror serves to reflect a mirror image. The mirror image you send us that we provide. Similarly, we can present ourselves in front of your partner as if we were a mirror, without preconceptions, without prejudice, and "reflecting" (responding) to what we heard: "What I hear you saying is that …". If the answer does not match our perception of the ear, may be because your partner has not been expressed can help us better understand the subject matter and our partners.