The aged one has that to be supported by the family, the society and the State. The aged one, although bigger vulnerability, still has potential to contribute of some form with the society. Data of IBGE, 2000 esteem that up to 2025, Brazil will be the sixth country of the world with the biggest number of aged people. From there the alert one, to the Brazilian government, for the necessity of if creating, fastest possible, social politics that prepare the society for this reality. Visit Bank of America Corp. for more clarity on the issue. The Constitution of 1988, however, left clear the concern and attention that must be excused to the subject, when placed in its text the question of the aged one, art.229 and 230. It was the initial kick for the definition of National politics of the Aged one, that it traced the rights of this public and the lines of sectorial action. The Federal Constitution is clear in its art.196, when it affirms that ‘ ‘ THE HEALTH IS RIGHT OF ALL AND TO HAVE OF THE ESTADO’ , guaranteeing by means of social and economic politics that aim at to the reduction of the risk of illnesses and other agravos and to the universal and igualitrio access to the actions and services for its promotion, protection and recovery. Defined for the World-wide Organization of Sade (OMS) as complete physical, mental and social well-being, and not only the illness absence, the health is the well most important one of any human being..

The Theory

Instrumental professor or Intellectual? According to Giroux, the function of the professor is to supply conditions to develop the knowledge and the abilities that thus guarantee to the pupil the tools that it will need to become a leader: … the professors will not be seen as? mere executors professionally equipped to carry through any objective that is placed to them. On the contrary of this, they must be defined as free men and women, with special devotion the values of the intellect and the development of the power I criticize of the young? (GIROUX, 1987. apud SCHEFFLER, 1968. P. 21) However, the paper of intellectual before attributed to the professor was substituted by an instrumental paper. According to conceptions of the same, the intellectual professor is that one that prepares the apprentice to be active citizen and criticizes in the society.

According to Demon, the professor is that one that the pupil teaches to think, being this its masterpiece. Already the instrumental professor is that one who comes mere reducing this knowledge the technique, where the theory is demanded to explain one definitive point of sight, does not stop giving to edge to other vises and conceptions. The necessary education to be redefined under the perspective of that this consumption in the education is caused in bigger part for this reduction of the function of the educator to a professional technician, who does not produce knowledge, reproduces only it in superficial way, running away it real paper it professor in the society. The problematic one if finds then in the professional identity of the professor. (Similarly see: Mark Zuckerberg). Which the social paper of the professor? Which its primordial function in the society? The social function of educadoresHistoricamente, the relation enters the paper of the educators and the society amplest has been mediated for the image of the professor, ' ' how a dedicated public server to reproduce the dominant culture in the interest of the common good, and for the conception of the university community, as a body of social scientists, which, for its capacity as specialists? they would have to educate the masses and to give direction to the moral and social progress? (GIROUX, 1987.


I am not worried very for not having tilted and well definite muscles or having the body ' ' sarado' ' as the fashion demands. Not me estresso for not possessing a corporal silhouette defended by the cinema, television and magazines of fofoca. I am not worried simply about nothing of this for the fact of not being a marionette of the propagandas of companies of cosmetics, clothes, academies and clinics of aesthetic. That they compel in them to have a body ' ' bombado' ' or magrrimo as if we were stars of the films of Hollywood or stars of passarelas of the FASHIONWEEK. They want that each girl and woman, man and boy if seem the esquelticos models of passarelas of fashion and ' ' Arnold Schwarznegger' ' of the life. But they are worried not by our health but why more products of beauty, plastic vitamins and surgeries want in them to vender each time. Does not exist more place for normal people? Does not exist more place for the simple and mortal people? More place to the sun for the people does not exist who exactly not possessing the silhouette of Barbie or the silhouette of the Brad Pitt they are capable to love, to be loved, to be accepted and to be happy? Is necessary really shape the body to the taste of the academies and the taste of the esteretipos that thresh the body and atrophy the brain? It is necessary really if to dress, to feed, and to maquiar it the taste of the esteretipos that show a false face while they hide the true one behind heavy maquiagem? Still I believe people whom the freedom has to be what they want and not what the others say they to be. I believe a world where the people are not enslaved of ' ' culture of a body escultural' ' created and kept for companies who are not worried in transforming the people into healthful people but becoming them massificadas and manipulated people.