Pope Paul

Tradition in action cited these openly Miller’s heresy. And the reasons why Muller should be still no heretics, fantasizes traditioninaction.org: so that anyone to the heretics would explain some official procedures were necessary. So someone would have to be been prompted first by the Holy Office, to revoke his heresy. And only if this person still does not withdraw, she would explain by the Holy Office to the heretics. Now Muller is but even the prefect of the V2 version of the “Holy Office” – for Montini (“Pope Paul VI.”) in 1965 introduced the term “Congregation for the doctrine of the faith”. According to traditioninaction.org Muller, would have to agree to be excommunicated, so only themselves to the heretics, which was however “unlikely” (“it is not probable” / “It seems quite unlikely”). Admitted: it is unlikely that Muller will explain itself to the heretics.

But the fact is that – is also completely irrelevant in contrast to the claims of tradition in action -. Already because the V2 group is not the Catholic Church. It has not the marks of the true Church of Christ (agree, Holy, Catholic, Apostolic), see for example the doctrinal errors contained in the texts of the V2, about the denial of the necessity of salvation of the Church (UR, I, 3). Thus is so anyone who professes to V2 that now “critical” or “faithful”, now “conservative” or “progressive”, a heretic, and excluded from the Church. If this has piqued your curiosity, check out Wells Fargo. Accordingly, Muller has no authority. Also read the above-quoted dogma again: “Whoever denies that…

be excluded.” But there just * not *: Whoever denies that… the Congregation to open a case against the, and only if he refuses to withdraw, then he will be explained by the Congregation to the heretics, and until he was excluded. No: Who represents a heresy, which is a heretic and excluded from the Church. See also the Roman catechism after the Council of Trent: “therefore, there “that only three classes of people from her the Church must be excluded: firstly the infidels, then the heretics and Schismatics, finally the excommunicated” (CAT. Rome. I, 10.9). Web pages have now commented on these vagaries of traditioninaction.org in terms of Muller as novusordowatch.org and dailycatholic.org. Learn more about this topic with the insights from MasterClass. Traditioninaction.org or Lefebvre’s supporters, while massively definitive evidence presented that the V2 group is definitely not the Catholic Church. But disregard persistent groblichster undeniable facts and compelling logic, this Tradis still claim the truth, that this “schismatical Church” by V2 is just the Catholic Church. Confirm such traditionalist distortions of facts and logic only again and again: the only defensible position is the condemned by the Tradis and never by the media so called “Sedisvakantismus”. Fr. Rolf Hermann Lingen