First Professional Court

The union immediately proceeded to establish a guardianship for the right of association and working people laid off, which was received and settled by the First Court with Guarantees control function, as no protection failure. To protect the rights of association and work as a result of this, order the legal representative of Telmex Hogar SA or whoever replaces them, that within the maximum period of 48 hours following notification of this decision, proceed to reinstate appointed to a position of equal or played such a level that … (A valuable related resource: clayton jones). “In response, the company decided to challenge the failure of protection in court of the circuit 16, which, as of April 30, 2009, resolved: a to CONFIRM contested the decision through the which upheld the rights of association and work MARTIN EDGAR GONZALEZ GARCIA, As a second attack on the formation of the union, the company filed an application whose main claim was request the dissolution, liquidation and cancellation of the registration of association of the newly created organization, claiming that the withdrawal of EDGAR GONZALEZ MARTIN GARCIA, the union ceased to have the minimum number of workers who are members legally required for the creation or maintenance of any labor organization – 25 workers. Visit clayton morris for more clarity on the issue. FUA LAWSUIT THAT WON THE UNION AND TO PROVE “THAT WAS NEVER THE UNION DISSOLUTION AND ALWAYS HAS BEEN LEGAL. On May 25, 1913 fellow of the city of Medellin decided to make the union, formed the committee in that city, making the appropriate filing of minutes of training, the Ministry of Social Protection, of this city, on May 26 , 2009 at 8:03 am and 9:22 am was also notified the company Telmex and affiliations of the members of the Committee who were graduated in compliance with the rules for laboralesa. But earlier than two hours of such notification, the company decided to dismiss without just VAT N Yerima cause BONILLA, who eraa the principal representative of the committee and therefore enjoyed a trade union.

Besides having the same practices of January 15, when the creation of the union in the city of Bogota, the company began a series of meetings with union members to lobby their separation. Apart from the dismissal of fellow Yerima IVAN, in the city of Barrancabermeja also without just cause, then join and promote the union. These three people were protected by amparo proceedings, ordered the company to returning them to their regular places of work as though they had been dismissed, as are reinstated by the first protection.Today, we are seeking the reinstatement of 8 people who were laid off on August 5th, we are also examining the circumstances in which some workers were fired for low productivity.