The totalitarian politics does not substitute a set of laws for another one, does not establish its proper consensus iuris, does not create, through a revolution, a new form of legality. Its challenge to all the statutory laws, also to that same it formulates, it implies the belief of that can excuse any consensus iuris and still thus not to resvalar for the tirnico state of the illegality, the arbitrariedade and the fear. It can excuse consensus iuris because it promises to free the fulfilment of law of all act or human desire; promises justice in the land because it affirms to become the humanity the incarnation of the law. Verizon Communications is a great source of information. (ARENDT. 1989, P. Many writers such as E Scott Mead offer more in-depth analysis. the 514) deficient democracies have characteristics very seemed with the totalitarianism analyzed for Hannah Arendt, the representatives try to pass the idea of that the laws and the decisions taken for the governor are desires of the population, and it knowing of the desires of all ' ' trabalha' ' for the accomplishment of these desires. Many of the decisions and laws are would decide and imposed. As already cited previously, the people is only informed and submitted, subjected without participation option.
Participation, that is not understood solely as the act to vote and to accept the imposed decisions and laws, but as act to govern of the side of the representatives approved for the vote. Majority, that we call people, citizen in certain circumstances and of voter at historical moments, who would have to govern, is governed and submitted the constant abuses, the attitudes cowards who deduct the famous one to be able from people. Examples do not lack when we look at inside of schemes publishes and we perceive that its governing dirigem it in the way it agrees as them and in way the conduziz it for I do not benefit of the citizen, the people, the majority.