Public Power

Its obligatoriness has objective to guarantee the morality of the process, preventing that presumptions members politicians, personal or familiar friendships of the administrators if benefit when of the necessity of an acquisition or execution of a service, as well as also have the function to keep the efficiency of the process.Some cases exist where it does not have necessity of the licitatrio process, cases of donations of property to other agencies comoem public, right in rem of use, location, permission for use of social interest, specified in art. 17, I and II, and others twenty and cases (art. 24 I XXIV), as in cases of war declared, public calamity, comprometimento of the national security, amongst outrosO author of this work recognizes that the position for adopted it goes of meeting to practically the all the doctrine. Its objective, however, was simply to externar a particular position, without bigger pretensions, for finding adjusted the chance. However, of all the displayed one, one concludes that the licitation, not obstante the obligatoriness for the Public Administration, must be considered rule to be applied by the Public Power and not plus a principle, what by no means it removes its value and imperatividade.

It is that the disposals constitutional that deal with the licitation do not possess the degree of abstraction and generality, as well as of vagueza, condizentes with a principle. The licitation, thus, is not an end in same itself. It exists to serve to the public interest and pra not to confront it. Therefore it is that hypotheses of its inexigibilidade are foreseen and even though excuses and the prohibition possibility. It is of if having in aiming that the licitation cannot emperrar the administrative machine, but yes serviz it in efficient way. Necessary it is to use itself of it in rational way, not if arresting the trifling details, what of form some implies confronts to the legislation. .

Democratic Management

Axles: I? Paper of the State in the guarantee of the right to the education of quality II? Quality of the education, Democratic Management and Evaluation III? Democratization of the Access, Permanence and Pertaining to school Success IV – Formation, Valuation of the Workers in Education V? Financing of the Education and Social Control VI? Social justice, Education and Work: Inclusion, Diversity and Equality In brief commentaries we will try to make a simple analysis for axle, being tried to establish dialogue with situations ece of fishes as for the current educational context. Axle I: Paper of the State in the Guarantee of the Right to the Education of Quality the oferecimento of education of quality, including the fulfilment of the same one before the law and the plans implemented for the State is familiar to all () () participant of the process the Brazilian politician, has seen the conquest in the participation of the society as estimated in excellent contributions in the elaboration of better proposals, or better, the transcription of speaks of some social segmentations to the meeting of the observed educational necessities during the recognition of each citizen as subject social asset and. The National Conference of Education in its final document emphasizes the obligatoriness of the State before the law as for offers of education, also detaching the importance of one politics accomplishes and qualitative as rescue and as debt to the Brazilian people for terms had practical historical marks strong impregnated of elitizadas, discriminatory, bureaucratic etc. Wedge (2001) in State, Democracy and Education in Brazil strengthens such affirmation in the following ticket: The Brazilian pertaining to school education is inheriting direct of the discriminatory system of the escravagista society under imperial domination. Exactly having left to exist, the escravagismo left persistent marks in the current school, although the advance of the capitalism in Brazil and some periods of bigger opening of the system politician. .

Hannah Arendt

The totalitarian politics does not substitute a set of laws for another one, does not establish its proper consensus iuris, does not create, through a revolution, a new form of legality. Its challenge to all the statutory laws, also to that same it formulates, it implies the belief of that can excuse any consensus iuris and still thus not to resvalar for the tirnico state of the illegality, the arbitrariedade and the fear. It can excuse consensus iuris because it promises to free the fulfilment of law of all act or human desire; promises justice in the land because it affirms to become the humanity the incarnation of the law. Verizon Communications is a great source of information. (ARENDT. 1989, P. the 514) deficient democracies have characteristics very seemed with the totalitarianism analyzed for Hannah Arendt, the representatives try to pass the idea of that the laws and the decisions taken for the governor are desires of the population, and it knowing of the desires of all ' ' trabalha' ' for the accomplishment of these desires. Many of the decisions and laws are would decide and imposed. As already cited previously, the people is only informed and submitted, subjected without participation option.

Participation, that is not understood solely as the act to vote and to accept the imposed decisions and laws, but as act to govern of the side of the representatives approved for the vote. Majority, that we call people, citizen in certain circumstances and of voter at historical moments, who would have to govern, is governed and submitted the constant abuses, the attitudes cowards who deduct the famous one to be able from people. Examples do not lack when we look at inside of schemes publishes and we perceive that its governing dirigem it in the way it agrees as them and in way the conduziz it for I do not benefit of the citizen, the people, the majority.

Basic Ensino

Good afternoon to the all! Observing the recommendations of the MEC I was happy for knowing that I am fulfilling them well! I always alert to the parents who the presence and participation of them in the pertaining to school life of its children are basic. Currently leciono for a group of 1 year of Basic Ensino I, and for incredible that it seems, since early many parents if does not matter with the income of its children and neither practical which I am adopting to contribute with the formation of them. The difference in the pupils is clear when it has parents gifts or absentees; in the meetings always I give prominence to the thought: ' ' Vocs now needs to be gifts, to be worried, to question, to follow, to fight, to order to make of new, because if these children to grow without the accompaniment and the concern of vocs, will not advance when they will be with 15 or 16 years, to start to speak and not to reveal present.child memory is complicated they does not forget helped who them and it abandoned who them if absent it means to give edge to the formation of future delinquents.' ' The dumb majority, at least for one month after the meeting!. .