Posts Tagged ‘law’

Dietetic Food And Balanced Diets – A First Approximation

Dietetic foods are regulated by the regulation of diet. It involves food, serve the particular nutritional requirements of specific groups of consumers, for example, persons, whereby the metabolism is disturbed. This group of people include people with diabetes mellitus or with a disorder of lipid metabolism, or persons who are subject to special physiological circumstances (E.g. infants, young children, pregnant women, overweight or athletes). Dietetic food is distinguished by the special nutrition needs of certain consumer groups so basically the foodstuffs of for general consumption and food supplements.

The advantage that disease-related statements are allowed in comparison to General foods and dietary supplements in some cases is dietary foods for marketing reasons. However, the distinction between dietary foods and food supplements in practice is not always easy as food supplement often consumed by individual groups of consumers due to their special needs be (such as athletes, seniors). Bill O’Grady has firm opinions on the matter. As in case of dietary food are balanced diets (dietary foods for special medical purposes) to consumer groups, undergoing a special diet situation due to diseases, suffering or discomfort. For even more opinions, read materials from Massoumi. Balanced diets so approaching the drugs because they have a therapeutic purpose as well as medicines in the broadest sense but rather should be reached concerning the inclusion of nutrients than about the inclusion of pharmacological active substances. The demarcation between the reported diets and medicines in practice is extremely difficult as well as in the distinction between dietary foods and food supplements. Balanced diets bring businesses charm, that they can be marketed as only foods with medicinal indications, without even To be medicines.

You must in contrast to medicines not a costly market approval, but must appear only before the placing on the market by the competent authority. Last but not least this will in practice more and more disputes between providers of balanced diets and other health companies. So far, the relationship to the health claims regulation and the question of the scientific substantiation of balanced diets are not sufficiently clarified by the courts. Perse decisions taken in recent years to reported diets show this. As a result, the dietary foods are and especially diets accounted for an extremely interesting product category, bringing however an increased risk potential with regard to disputes with competitors, competition associations and public authorities. Other non-binding and free information relating to food law, see

Amendment To The Act Should Rip Off On The Internet Make It Difficult

Auer Witte Thiel inform you Witte Thiel draft of the Federal Government against online fraud Auer informed about the draft of the Federal Government against online fraud Munich November 2010. With a new legislation, the Federal Government wants to proceed against rip off on the Internet. The current draft provides an amendment of 312e of the BGB, which aims to create more transparency and legal certainty. Auer Witte Thiel lawyers inform the current projects against fraud. The Federal Ministry of Justice worked out a new draft, which in the future could make it difficult frivolous business practices and fraud on the Internet. Goal of the novel: the electronic commerce are designed to change 312e of the civil code on the basis of a transparent, generating greater legal certainty. The rip off, for example, by certain unclear total cost for Internet orders is so difficult, so the assessment by Auer Witte Thiel. Specifically, the draft developed in the Federal Ministry of Justice provides a so-called button solution” “before: in future the ordering pages according to draft must be a highlighted and clearly designed note” included on price and delivery costs, the customer click expressly approve.

Missing this feature in the ordering process, in the future no legally valid contract is concluded, Auer Witte Thiel summarizes the planned scheme. Auer Witte Thiel lawyers are in favour of the planned revision of the 312e BGB as a political response to known issues with Internet orders. Auer Witte Thiel advises eCommerce companies to do this, already on the consequences of the draft of law against fraud in the Internet to adapt, in order to avoid disadvantages. According to Auer Witte Thiel, entrepreneurs should take advantage of the time up to the entry into force and develop concepts which enable a distinction against unserious online companies. Furthermore, Auer Witte Thiel advocates, to communicate transparency and customer orientation, active with the own foreign representation. These factors can in advertising campaigns in the face of sustained media coverage of about Internet fraud be a key differentiator, so the experience of Auer Witte Thiel. According to Auer Witte Thiel, it is expected that the draft law against rip off passes through the legislative process without major changes. Afterwards, Internet entrepreneurs three months have reminded time to implement the required measures, Auer Witte Thiel. More information: about Auer Witte Thiel the firm Auer Witte Thiel is divided into two different areas of expertise: the firm for Receivables Management and the firm specializing in business law. So the lawyers Auer Witte Thiel in the core areas of rental and real estate law, travel law, press and publishing law, consumer credit law and competition, trademarks are also knowledgeable and experienced in the entire area of demand management. How to contact with Auer Witte Thiel lawyers lawyer Tobias Steiner Bayerstrasse 27 80335 Munich phone: 089/59 98 97 60 fax: 089 / 550 38 71 E-Mail: Web:

Executive Board

Of workers calls for a job reference, only after leaving that might jeopardize his claim to a backdating. The Federal Labor Court has rejected the claim of the employee on a ungefaltetes certificate of work as long as the crease on a copy of the certificate is not recognizable. Nevertheless you should insist on a certificate of work unfolded. 7. signature by the boss, anyway, by senior must employees signing the testimony of the owner of the company, or CEO of a company’s Board or the authorized persons such as department head, company lawyers or attorneys. Must emerge from their status but clearly, they are ranked higher than the workers.

The power of Attorney must be by additives such as PPA or i. V. are characterized. Who was directly subordinate to the Executive Board, are entitled to their signature in the certificate. Gary Kelly has plenty of information regarding this issue. A Manager work certificate must be signed by the Managing Director and not only of a different Manager.

8 action on improvement of the work certificate of workers should carefully examine the certificate upon receipt and if necessary take the employer change in claim. He can sue the employers before the Labour Court. A claim on some formulations in the certificate does not exist basically. However, a witness dispute is often very annoying the employers. Also, it costs money, even if the employer WINS, since in the first instance, both sides bear their own costs and a refund does not take place by the underdogs. The judges have no excessive interest on such disputes infertile from their point of view. This enormously increases the willingness of the comparison so that the bottom line often stop such procedures to the satisfaction of the employee. The Claim for rectification of the certificate will forfeit if he is logged in too late. This is done already five to ten months after certification. Then, the employer in each case can be free to adjust that workers accepted the testimony content. 9 many express working testimony even supervisors allow their employees to write an intermediate or final certificate of work itself. This is safe and even advisable as long as the certificate remains true in terms of content. A job reference that corresponds to reality and lightly just out of courtesy or convenience has been issued, may constitute a liability to third parties. However, such procedures in practice are extremely rare. A post by lawyer Alexander Bredereck, Berlin lawyer specializing in labour law polymath welcome lawyers Berlin-Charlottenburg: Kurfurstendamm 216 (corner of pheasant road), 10719 Berlin (Metro station Uhlandstrasse, suburban trains and Metro station Zoologischer Garten) Berlin-Mitte: Palais am Moat, 10117 Berlin, access via road under den Linden (rail and subway station Friedrichstrasse) Branch Office Berlin-Marzahn: Marzahn promenade 28, 12679 Berlin (Bahn Marzahn) Potsdam: Friedrich-Ebert-Strasse 33, 14469 Potsdam Tel. (030) 4 000 4 999 E-mail: about labour law: